The Waltz's Third Level of Analysis and China's Pursuit of Legitimacy Via the AIIB
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: Since 2016, the Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank (AIIB) has assisted countries in improving their economic conditions with infrastructure and transport projects. Publicly proposed in 2013 by China's President, Xi Jinping, during his state visit to Indonesia, the AIIB has helped consolidate China's legitimacy as a leading power in Asia and globally. Thus, this paper argues that forming the AIIB was a move to counter the relatively low vote share in the neoliberal's international financial institutions, namely the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the Japan-led Asian Development Bank (ADB). With the added benefit of leading a development institution, more legitimacy is gained via the international system. Since its establishment, AIIB had significantly increased from 57 founding members in 2016 to 103 in 2020. In examining how this translates into China gaining legitimacy from the international system, this paper examined the case of China's AIIB through the Third Level of Analysis in Kenneth Waltz's Neorealism. In his The State, And War, Waltz argued for the "Levels of Analysis" and convinced the third level analyses a state's legitimacy and goals via the international system's responses and interactions. This paper examined the relationship between China's standing in the eyes of the world and the acceptance of AIIB as a legitimate development institution.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the WILAYAH implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report or abstract), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that all co-authors have approved its publication. The WILAYAH : International Journal of East Asian Studies adopts CC BY license. As such, we would be grateful if an acknowledgement accompanies the republication that the work was originally published in WILAYAH. The editors will ensure digital preservation of access to the journal content by the Journal depository section.
Disclaimer
Although the Department of East Asian Studies is the publisher of the WILAYAH : International Journal of East Asian Studies, the views presented in the WILAYAH are entirely those of the contributors and do not reflect the official stand of the Department of East Asian Studies. The Department does not hold itself responsible for the accuracy of any article published. Publisher and co-publishers assume no responsibility, nor by the editors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a result of any actual or alleged libellous statements, infringement of intellectual property or privacy rights, or products liability, whether resulting from negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, procedures, products or methods contained in the material therein.
References
Ba, Alice. 2017. In Pursuit of Asian Infrastructure & Investment Bank: The Politics and
Geopolitics of a Chinese Bank. In Rothman S.B, Vyas, Utpal & Sato, Yoichiro (ed.). Regional
Institutions, Geopolitics and Economics in the Asia-Pacific: Evolving Interests and Strategies,
pp. 27 – 45. New York: Routledge.
Birdsall, Nancy & Morris, Scott. 2017. Five Innovations at the AIIB. Center for Global
Development. https://www.cgdev.org/blog/five-innovations-aiib
Byman, D.L & Pollack, K.M. 2001. Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In. International Security, 25(4): pp. 107-146.
Finnemore, Martha. 2009. Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why
Being a Unipole Isn’t All It’s Cracked Up to Be. World Politics, 61(1): pp. 58-85.
Friedman, Steven. 2012. The Forgotten Sovereign: Citizens, States and Foreign Policy in the
South. In East, M.A. & Robertson, Justin (ed.). Diplomacy and Developing Nations:Post-
Cold War Foreign Policy-Making Structures and Processes, pp. 225 – 252. London:
Routledge.
Horta, Korinna and Wang, Wawa, “The AIIB Fails on Public Access to Information” Reconnecting
Asia. Accessed at https://reconasia.csis.org/the-aiib-fails-on-public-access-to-information/
Huang, Kristin, “China-Canada Ties to Get Frostier After Call to Leave AIIB, Analysts Say,” South
China Morning Post, December 12, 2019.
Johnson, Ian. 2017. Xi Jinping and China’s New Era of Glory. The New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/13/sunday-review/xi-jinping-china.html
Morris, Scott & Higashikokubaru, Mamoru. 2015. Doing the Math on AIIB Governance. Center
for Global Development. https://www.cgdev.org/blog/doing-math-aiib-governance
Shirk, Susan. 2014. The Domestic Context Of Chinese Foreign Security Policies. In Pekkanen,
S.M., Ravenhill, John & Foot, Rosemary (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the International
Relations of Asia, pp. 391 – 410. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Man, The State, And War. New York: Columbia University Press.
White, Edward and Reed, John, “China-backed AIIB Leaves Door Open to Lending To Myanmar’s
Junta,” Financial Times, June 2, 2021,
https://www.ft.com/content/cd39eba0-6bfb-4c5e-b68d-bfd00c2d7801
Wohlforth, W.C. Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War. World Politics, 61(1): pp. 28-57.